|
a newsletter and Web
log
by Frank Vozzo
Director of Student
Learning Outcomes Assessment
|
|
January 16, 2006
|
In this report:
Sage annually surveys newly-graduated students about their employment. Until recently, the data has been distributed only to a few faculty members (such as department chairs). You can read two of the latest reports for yourself on CampusCruiser/My Cruiser/My Committees/TSC Faculty Staff and Administrators/Shared Files/Institutional Research and Planning/Career Planning Reports. You’ll find data on each academic program across the four colleges. The data include rates of initial employment in field of study, and rates of pursuit of further study in the field.
The National Survey of Student Engagement is known for helping colleges and universities to “use their data to identify aspects of the undergraduate experience inside and outside the classroom that can be improved through changes in policies and practices more consistent with good practices in undergraduate education” (NSSE Quick Facts). Project DEEP (Documenting Effective Educational Practice) studied twenty institutions that had consistently high marks on NSSE. There were three main lessons learned from the study:
One of the shared
characteristics of the project DEEP institutions is commitment to good
academic experiences outside the classroom.
This includes improving a variety of environmental factors such as
common study space, access to the faculty, respect for diversity, and support for student
organizations (such as including students in all committees). It also includes support for elements of the curriculum such
as internships and senior projects, and innovative pedagogies in first-year
courses.
You can view some
PowerPoint slides about Project DEEP:
Jillian Kinzie, NSSE, “Promoting Student Success: DEEP Lessons for Teaching and Learning” available at
http://www.indiana.edu/~nsse/pdf/conference_presentations/2005/POD2005_kinzie.pdf
George D. Kuh and Jillian Kinzie, NSSE, “Enhancing Learning: DEEP Lessons about Effective Educational Practice and Student Success” available at
http://www.indiana.edu/~nsse/pdf/conference_presentations/2005/acpa2005.pdf
A student portfolio is a
collection of specific artifacts (documents, products, performances, media,
etc.) generated and collected over time, which are to be used by the student
and others to assess both the development of the student and the effectiveness
of the educational process. The
portfolio has long been considered one of the best available assessment tools.
Organizing and reviewing portfolio information can be very time
consuming, so sampling is often employed.
There may be multiple groups interested in using the data in the
portfolio, so electronic portfolios that digitize and organize the information
and present it in a number of predetermined ways can be useful.
Portfolios have been used in K-12 education, and at the college level for the preparation of teacher candidates, for many years. It has only been in the last eight years or so that a significant number of colleges and universities have begun using portfolios for assessment of major programs and general education. Some colleges have assessment offices that collect the artifacts from students and do the organizing; however, most colleges that use portfolios have the students collect and organize the information themselves. There are usually incentives involved, to insure adequate numbers of portfolios to work with.
An important element of a
student portfolio is self-assessment.
For example, a senior “looks back”: writing (with guidance) a
reflective essay about course work done in prior years as it relates to the
specific knowledge and skills expected upon graduating.
This has many benefits. The
process of writing the essay can leave the student with a good feeling about
the institution. The essay can be
used by the student as part of a job application.
It can be used by program faculty along with the specific artifacts
mentioned to look for disconnect between student and faculty expectations.
Portfolios can also be used
to inform the faculty. I would
like to pick up a portfolio and see what my advisees are spending their time
doing (vs. what I think they are doing) in the courses I don’t teach (such
as ENG-101 or CRJ-353). I would
have more of an appreciation for the breadth of their college experience, and
would find ways to make better connections between the fragments.
Portfolio reading would be an efficient faculty development exercise
for a junior faculty member. One
might learn as much about the institution from a week of portfolio analysis as
one would get from leading the curriculum committee for five years!
Here are two Web sites for
further reading (each with a different emphasis):
Douglas J. Eder, “Portfolios”, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville’s Wing Portfolio Assessment Project (2005), available at
http://www.siue.edu/~deder/assess/portwing.html
Robert Sterken, “Student Web Portfolio Project”, Palomar Community College, San Marcos, CA (1999), available at
http://www.palomar.edu/alp/Portfolio.htm
|
|
In next week's OARs: assessment at some local competitor colleges.
Home...